Mulyagusdin

AIL2 Ditulis ulang di aceh.tribunnews.com dengan sudut pandang berbeda↗

The future of Aceh's oil and gas autonomy right now looks like two trains running at the same time on separate tracks. On one side, the Bill to Replace Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Natural Gas (the Oil and Gas Bill) is moving at full speed through the House of Representatives in Senayan. On the other, the proposed revision of the Law on the Governing of Aceh (UUPA), which among other things touches Article 160, is crawling along with no clear timeline.

What's genuinely unsettling is the silence back home. As of 24 August 2026, there has been almost no sharp, focused public statement from the Aceh government, the DPRA, BPMA, or Aceh's representatives at the national level about this Bill. Yet the dynamics in Jakarta are redrawing the national energy architecture in ways that will hit Aceh directly. The window to respond is narrowing, and staying quiet is clearly not a winning strategy.

Why This Bill Is So Urgent

For anyone who thinks this is just a routine revision, look at the timeline in parliament. This Oil and Gas Bill is not a partial revision. In mid-August, the House's Legislation Body (Baleg) unanimously approved its harmonization. Just days later, a plenary session passed it as a House initiative bill. Commission XII has even publicly set a highly ambitious target: passage by October 2026.

This rapid movement rests on strong historical and constitutional grounds. At its core, this regulation is a response to Constitutional Court Ruling No. 36/PUU-X/2012 which dissolved BP Migas. After more than a decade of regulatory vacuum with no definitive replacement, the state is now preparing to overhaul its upstream oil and gas governance entirely.

The Design of BUK Migas and Aceh's Vulnerable Position

The most radical change in this Bill is the creation of a Special Business Entity (BUK) for oil and gas. Conceptually, this new body will take over the functions of SKK Migas, but with far greater authority. BUK is designed as a public legal entity answerable directly to the President, acting as both regulator and business entity at once.

Discussions in parliament indicate that BUK will hold full authority over every working area in Indonesia. Whoever the investor is, they will be required to partner with this single body. This is exactly where a governance clash threatens Aceh's oil and gas autonomy directly.

Aceh, through BPMA, has built its own foundation of authority guaranteed by the UUPA and Government Regulation No. 23 of 2015. This long struggle has produced two milestones in recent months. First, BPMA's memorandum of understanding with SKK Migas in May 2026, which opened Aceh's involvement as offshore oil and gas regulator from 12 to 200 nautical miles. Second, the DPRA's approval of a proposed revision to Article 160 of the UUPA that seeks to extend that joint management to the Exclusive Economic Zone, though this proposal is still awaiting further review from the House's Legislation Body. If BUK is passed into law as the sole authority without a clear exemption clause for Aceh, both milestones risk being reduced right back to zero.

The Lex Specialis Myth and the Economic Stakes

Many people may feel safe assuming the UUPA carries special legal protection that overrides general law. But political reality and our legislative history often prove otherwise. Newly issued sectoral laws frequently fail to adopt, or even clash with, regional distinctions if they aren't closely guarded from the drafting stage onward. The proof: it took Aceh years of negotiation, right up to this year, just to gain recognition for managing oil and gas beyond 12 nautical miles.

Beyond the legal question, there are economic calculations and trillions of rupiah in investment at stake, as discussed earlier in Courting Investors Before Profit-Sharing Is Settled. BUK's status as both operator and regulator raises monopoly concerns. If BPMA loses its equal footing, Aceh will lose its strategic bargaining power over managing its own economic assets.

That's why every Aceh stakeholder needs to work together and get involved in drafting the List of Problem Inventory (DIM) in Senayan right now. Three vital points need to be secured:

• Explicit Recognition of BPMA: Aceh must ensure the Bill's transitional provisions explicitly recognize BPMA's existence and its derivative regulations, so that Aceh's oil and gas autonomy isn't erased by the new system.
• Clarity on the Revenue-Sharing Fund (DBH): The proposed 20 percent share for oil and 35 percent for gas to producing regions must be spelled out in detail. Firm figures matter for regional revenue transparency and financial accountability going forward.
• Guarantee for Existing Contracts: Critical, already-operating working areas such as Blok B, Blok A, the ONWA/OSWA area (offshore blocks north of Aceh), and the major potential at the Andaman Block must be guaranteed to remain under BPMA's oversight regime.

A strong national BUK Migas isn't actually a threat, as long as its position toward Aceh is spelled out in writing rather than left as partnership rhetoric that evaporates the moment the law passes. An efficient one-door system is exactly what's needed to give investors legal certainty, which in turn could speed up investment realization in Aceh's waters. But that certainty has to take the form of a clause, not a verbal promise. Explicit recognition of BPMA's authority needs to be written into the Bill's transitional provisions before the DIM stage wraps up, ideally finished alongside the October 2026 passage target, rather than patched later through a memorandum of understanding or derivative regulation after the law takes effect, which is the pattern so far. It could take the shape of a two-tier partnership: BUK holds national authority over cross-working-area matters like integrated data, technical standardization, and major contract negotiations, while BPMA remains the operational executor and day-to-day regulator within its jurisdiction under the UUPA. That's what a concrete, equal partnership protecting Aceh's oil and gas autonomy actually looks like, not just a phrase in an official's speech. It's time for Aceh to speak up in parliament, before the new rules push this region away from its own table.

Sources and references

• CNBC Indonesia (21 August 2026). Provides the timeline of the DPR plenary session along with statements from Eddy Soeparno and Bambang Haryadi on the proposed Oil and Gas Bill and the new body replacing SKK Migas. Link.
• Antara News (19 August 2026). An analysis by Rifqi Nuril Huda (DPR Expert Staff) examining BUK Migas's authority design, the public legal entity concept, and the constitutional criticism behind it. Link.
• BPK RI Regulation Database. The primary document of Government Regulation No. 23 of 2015, the legal basis for BPMA's authority. Link.
• Antara News (May 2026). News coverage of the MoU signing between BPMA and SKK Migas confirming the expanded involvement of Aceh in offshore oil and gas management. Link.
• Waspada Aceh. A report on the DPRA's approval of the proposal to extend Aceh's oil and gas management to the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Link.
• Antara News. News updates on the Coordinating Ministry for Law, Human Rights, Immigration and Corrections (Kemenko Kumham HAM) overseeing the discussion of the revision to the Law on the Governing of Aceh (UUPA). Link.